2002年Text 3
Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-80, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.
Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (in constant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, it oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies-to which heavy industry has shifted-have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.
One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist's commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.
52. It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if
[A] price of crude rises.
[B] commodity prices rise.
[C] consumption rises.
[D] oil taxes rise.
[答案] D
[解題思路]
文章中關(guān)于retail price的內(nèi)容出現(xiàn)在第三段的最后一句"In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past"（在歐洲，稅費(fèi)在汽油零售價(jià)中的比例高達(dá)4/5，因此，即使原油價(jià)格發(fā)生很大的波動(dòng)，汽油價(jià)格所受的影響也不會(huì)像過去那么顯著）�？梢姸愘M(fèi)在汽油零售價(jià)格中所占的比重最大，因此只有當(dāng)油稅大幅度提高的時(shí)候汽油零售價(jià)格才會(huì)隨之大幅提高。A選項(xiàng)的意思與原文相反，而B、C兩個(gè)因素與汽油零售價(jià)格無關(guān)。
[題目譯文]
從文中可以推斷，汽油零售價(jià)格在以下哪個(gè)條件下會(huì)急劇上升？
[A] 原油價(jià)格上升
[B] 商品價(jià)格上升
[C] 消費(fèi)增長
[D] 油稅上漲
54. We can draw a conclusion from the text that
[A] oil-price shocks are less shocking now.
[B] inflation seems irrelevant to oil-price shocks.
[C] energy conservation can keep down the oil prices.
[D] the price rise of crude leads to the shrinking of heavy industry.
[答案] A
[解題思路]
文章開頭提出一個(gè)問題，即目前的石油價(jià)格上漲是否會(huì)像過去的石油恐慌一樣導(dǎo)致經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退？作者給出的回答是不會(huì)。作者將目前的石油價(jià)格上漲與過去做了比較，指出現(xiàn)在情況已經(jīng)不同，原油價(jià)格在汽油的整個(gè)價(jià)格中所占比例減少，石油價(jià)格上漲對于各國GDP的影響也變小，同時(shí)現(xiàn)在的經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢比過于要好。因此，現(xiàn)在的石油價(jià)格上漲不至于引起過去那樣的恐慌，因此A為正確答案。
[題目譯文]
從文中我們可以得出以下結(jié)論
[A] 油價(jià)恐慌現(xiàn)在并不那么令人恐慌了
[B] 通貨膨脹看起來與油價(jià)恐慌無關(guān)
[C] 能源保護(hù)能夠使油價(jià)保持在低水平
[D] 原油價(jià)格的上漲導(dǎo)致了重工業(yè)的萎縮
相關(guān)推薦：
新東方：09考研英語翻譯常考和必考詞匯集錦 考研英語閱讀理解命題思路透析和真題揭秘 2009年考研英語歷年真題閱讀理解精讀筆記匯總
