首頁 考試吧論壇 Exam8視線 考試商城 網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程 模擬考試 考友錄 實(shí)用文檔 求職招聘 論文下載
2011中考 | 2011高考 | 2012考研 | 考研培訓(xùn) | 在職研 | 自學(xué)考試 | 成人高考 | 法律碩士 | MBA考試
MPA考試 | 中科院
四六級 | 職稱英語 | 商務(wù)英語 | 公共英語 | 托福 | 雅思 | 專四專八 | 口譯筆譯 | 博思 | GRE GMAT
新概念英語 | 成人英語三級 | 申碩英語 | 攻碩英語 | 職稱日語 | 日語學(xué)習(xí) | 法語 | 德語 | 韓語
計(jì)算機(jī)等級考試 | 軟件水平考試 | 職稱計(jì)算機(jī) | 微軟認(rèn)證 | 思科認(rèn)證 | Oracle認(rèn)證 | Linux認(rèn)證
華為認(rèn)證 | Java認(rèn)證
公務(wù)員 | 報關(guān)員 | 銀行從業(yè)資格 | 證券從業(yè)資格 | 期貨從業(yè)資格 | 司法考試 | 法律顧問 | 導(dǎo)游資格
報檢員 | 教師資格 | 社會工作者 | 外銷員 | 國際商務(wù)師 | 跟單員 | 單證員 | 物流師 | 價格鑒證師
人力資源 | 管理咨詢師考試 | 秘書資格 | 心理咨詢師考試 | 出版專業(yè)資格 | 廣告師職業(yè)水平
駕駛員 | 網(wǎng)絡(luò)編輯
衛(wèi)生資格 | 執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)藥師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士
會計(jì)從業(yè)資格考試會計(jì)證) | 經(jīng)濟(jì)師 | 會計(jì)職稱 | 注冊會計(jì)師 | 審計(jì)師 | 注冊稅務(wù)師
注冊資產(chǎn)評估師 | 高級會計(jì)師 | ACCA | 統(tǒng)計(jì)師 | 精算師 | 理財規(guī)劃師 | 國際內(nèi)審師
一級建造師 | 二級建造師 | 造價工程師 | 造價員 | 咨詢工程師 | 監(jiān)理工程師 | 安全工程師
質(zhì)量工程師 | 物業(yè)管理師 | 招標(biāo)師 | 結(jié)構(gòu)工程師 | 建筑師 | 房地產(chǎn)估價師 | 土地估價師 | 巖土師
設(shè)備監(jiān)理師 | 房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人 | 投資項(xiàng)目管理師 | 土地登記代理人 | 環(huán)境影響評價師 | 環(huán)保工程師
城市規(guī)劃師 | 公路監(jiān)理師 | 公路造價師 | 安全評價師 | 電氣工程師 | 注冊測繪師 | 注冊計(jì)量師
繽紛校園 | 實(shí)用文檔 | 英語學(xué)習(xí) | 作文大全 | 求職招聘 | 論文下載 | 訪談 | 游戲
考研_考試吧考研_首發(fā)2011考研成績查詢
考研網(wǎng)校 模擬考場 考研資訊 復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo) 歷年真題 模擬試題 經(jīng)驗(yàn) 考研查分 考研復(fù)試 考研調(diào)劑 論壇 短信提醒
考研英語| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研政治| 資料 真題 模擬題  考研數(shù)學(xué)| 資料 真題 模擬題  專業(yè)課| 資料 真題 模擬題  在職研究生

考研英語閱讀理解命題思路透析和真題揭秘(35)

2005年Text 1

Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as "all too human", with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well.

The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys, which have all the necessary ingredients to capture the public imagination. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food readily. Above all, like their finicky female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of "goods and services" than males (although why this is so remains a mystery).

Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr Brosnan's and Dr de Waal's study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to swap pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.

In the world of capuchins, grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers). So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (in the absence of an actual monkey able to eat it) was enough to induce sullen behaviour in a female capuchin.

Dr Brosnan and Dr de Waal report that such behaviour is unusual in their trained monkeys. During two years of bartering prior to these experiments, failure to exchange tokens for food occurred in fewer than 5% of trials. And what made the behaviour even more extraordinary was that these monkeys forfeited food that they could see-and which they would have readily accepted in almost any other set of circumstances.

The researchers suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor that the species had 35m years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.

23. Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most probably because they are
[A] more inclined to weigh what they get.
[B] attentive to researchers' instructions.
[C] nice in both appearance and temperament.
[D] more generous than their male companions.

[答案] A

[解題思路]

本文的對應(yīng)信息在文章的第二段。第二段中先談到了母卷尾猴的特征有cute, good-natured, cooperative, share food readily等,這些分別與B、C、D選項(xiàng)符合。下一句話提到,最重要的是,"它們往往比雄性猴子更注重商品和服務(wù)的價值",這才是最重要的原因。A選項(xiàng)中"weigh"這個詞的意思是"衡量",該次是解題的關(guān)鍵,但是也可以通過排除其他三個選項(xiàng)得出正確答案。

[題目譯文]

母卷尾猴之所以被選為研究對象的最重要原因是它們
[A] 更會權(quán)衡它們得到的東西
[B] 認(rèn)真聽研究人員的指揮
[C] 外表和性情都很好
[D] 比公卷尾猴更加大方

24. Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys
[A] prefer grapes to cucumbers.
[B] can be taught to exchange things.
[C] will not be co-operative if feeling cheated.
[D] are unhappy when separated from others.

[答案] C

[解題思路]

本文的對應(yīng)信息在文章的最后一段,"Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated"(這種合作只有在每只猴子感到自己沒有受到欺騙時才可能穩(wěn)定),也就是說如果它們感到自己受騙、就不會合作。A、B選項(xiàng)在文中都有提及,但不是研究成果。D選項(xiàng)的錯誤在于文中并沒有提到這一點(diǎn)。

[題目譯文]

Brosnan博士和de Waal博士最終在他們的研究中發(fā)現(xiàn)猴子
[A] 比起黃瓜更喜歡葡萄
[B] 能夠?qū)W會交換東西
[C] 如果感到受騙就會拒絕合作
[D] 在于其它猴子分開時就會不開心

上一頁  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  下一頁

  相關(guān)推薦:考研英語閱讀理解命題思路透析和真題揭秘
       2009年考研英語歷年真題閱讀理解精讀筆記匯總

文章搜索
任汝芬老師
在線名師:任汝芬老師
   著名政治教育專家;研究生、博士生導(dǎo)師;中國國家人事人才培...[詳細(xì)]
考研欄目導(dǎo)航
版權(quán)聲明:如果考研網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會及時處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本考研網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請注明出處。