對(duì)立觀(guān)點(diǎn)型

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition of at least 150 words but no more than 200 words according to the following information:

　　Currently, a number of schools allow students to grade their teachers and even decide if the teachers can teach on or not. This has given rise to a heated debate, with some approving of the pratice and others strongly opposed to it. Now discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　點(diǎn)擊查看：2014年12月大學(xué)英語(yǔ)六級(jí)作文預(yù)測(cè)匯總

　　>>>>2014六級(jí)考題大數(shù)據(jù)預(yù)測(cè) 僅限300席 立即搶購(gòu)

　　對(duì)立觀(guān)點(diǎn)型

　　Is It Up to Students to Evaluate Teachers?

　　The past few years have witnessed a mounting number of universities allowing students to evaluate their teachers and even decide if they can stay on their positions or not. To this practice, people’s attitudes differ considerably. Some applaud it warmly whereas others criticize and even condemn it harshly.

　　Proponents of the practice may list the following reasons. In the first place, they assert that students are the people who know the most clearly about the teaching performance of a teacher, so they should have the say in evaluating him or her. In the second place, they contend that students have paid for their education, so they have the right to decide which teacher should be employed.

　　Opponents, however, point out that it is dangerous to leave the right to students to evaluate teachers. For one thing, students may not know what ought to be taught and how it should be taught; they may only judge a teacher according to his temper and even accent or appearance. For another, in order to please students, some teachers may resort to some improper means.

　　Personally, I believe that both views are justifiable, and we should achieve a balance between them by employing the evaluating approach in a reasonable and beneficial way. To be specific, students should be allowed to evaluate their teachers, but they may not be the only decision-maker in the teachers’ fate.

　　(或Personally, I think that both sides have something right. Actually, lottery games should be viewed as a two-edged sword, which presents us with both benefits and troubles. But we should not give up eating for fear of choking. The best policy, as I see it, is to maximize their advantages and eliminate their unhealthy side-effects. Or in other words, we should further develop lottery games and exert proper supervision over them so that they can benefit us in a better way.)

關(guān)注"考試吧四六級(jí)"微信，獲取最新作文預(yù)測(cè)、真題答案、內(nèi)部資料！

英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)題庫(kù)【手機(jī)題庫(kù)下載】 | 搜索公眾號(hào)"566四六級(jí)"

　　相關(guān)推薦：

　　2014年12月英語(yǔ)六級(jí)寫(xiě)作技巧及常用句型匯總

　　2014年12月大學(xué)英語(yǔ)六級(jí)寫(xiě)作萬(wàn)能句式模板匯總

　　2014年12月大學(xué)英語(yǔ)六級(jí)作文高分句式考前沖刺