首頁 考試吧論壇 Exam8視線 考試商城 網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程 模擬考試 考友錄 實(shí)用文檔 求職招聘 論文下載
2013中考 | 2013高考 | 2013考研 | 考研培訓(xùn) | 在職研 | 自學(xué)考試 | 成人高考 | 法律碩士 | MBA考試
MPA考試 | 中科院
四六級 | 職稱英語 | 商務(wù)英語 | 公共英語 | 托福 | 托業(yè) | 雅思 | 專四專八 | 口譯筆譯 | 博思
GRE GMAT | 新概念英語 | 成人英語三級 | 申碩英語 | 攻碩英語 | 職稱日語 | 日語學(xué)習(xí) |
零起點(diǎn)法語 | 零起點(diǎn)德語 | 零起點(diǎn)韓語
計(jì)算機(jī)等級考試 | 軟件水平考試 | 職稱計(jì)算機(jī) | 微軟認(rèn)證 | 思科認(rèn)證 | Oracle認(rèn)證 | Linux認(rèn)證
華為認(rèn)證 | Java認(rèn)證
公務(wù)員 | 報(bào)關(guān)員 | 銀行從業(yè)資格 | 證券從業(yè)資格 | 期貨從業(yè)資格 | 司法考試 | 法律顧問 | 導(dǎo)游資格
報(bào)檢員 | 教師資格 | 社會工作者 | 外銷員 | 國際商務(wù)師 | 跟單員 | 單證員 | 物流師 | 價(jià)格鑒證師
人力資源 | 管理咨詢師 | 秘書資格 | 心理咨詢師 | 出版專業(yè)資格 | 廣告師職業(yè)水平 | 駕駛員
網(wǎng)絡(luò)編輯 | 公共營養(yǎng)師 | 國際貨運(yùn)代理人 | 保險(xiǎn)從業(yè)資格 | 電子商務(wù)師 | 普通話 | 企業(yè)培訓(xùn)師
營銷師
衛(wèi)生資格 | 執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)藥師 | 執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士
會計(jì)從業(yè)資格考試會計(jì)證) | 經(jīng)濟(jì)師 | 會計(jì)職稱 | 注冊會計(jì)師 | 審計(jì)師 | 注冊稅務(wù)師
注冊資產(chǎn)評估師 | 高級會計(jì)師 | ACCA | 統(tǒng)計(jì)師 | 精算師 | 理財(cái)規(guī)劃師 | 國際內(nèi)審師
一級建造師 | 二級建造師 | 造價(jià)工程師 | 造價(jià)員 | 咨詢工程師 | 監(jiān)理工程師 | 安全工程師
質(zhì)量工程師 | 物業(yè)管理師 | 招標(biāo)師 | 結(jié)構(gòu)工程師 | 建筑師 | 房地產(chǎn)估價(jià)師 | 土地估價(jià)師 | 巖土師
設(shè)備監(jiān)理師 | 房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人 | 投資項(xiàng)目管理師 | 土地登記代理人 | 環(huán)境影響評價(jià)師 | 環(huán)保工程師
城市規(guī)劃師 | 公路監(jiān)理師 | 公路造價(jià)師 | 安全評價(jià)師 | 電氣工程師 | 注冊測繪師 | 注冊計(jì)量師
化工工程師 | 材料員
繽紛校園 | 實(shí)用文檔 | 英語學(xué)習(xí) | 作文大全 | 求職招聘 | 論文下載 | 訪談 | 游戲
英語四六級考試
您現(xiàn)在的位置: 考試吧(Exam8.com) > 英語四六級考試 > 學(xué)習(xí)資料 > 英語四級 > 閱讀 > 正文

2010年大學(xué)英語四六級考試精讀薈萃100篇(41)

為了提高廣大考生閱讀理解能力,考試吧整理了以下閱讀資料,供考生復(fù)習(xí)。

  Passage Eleven (The Affect of Electricity on Cancer)

  Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.

  Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence “suggests a casual link” between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as “a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans.”

  The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the Whit House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.

  At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, tit generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.

  How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such “ionizing” radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.

  But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.

  The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having “biased the entire document” toward proving a link. “Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer,” the Air Force concludes. “It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report.” Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.

  1. The main idea of this passage is

  [A]. studies on the cause of cancer

  [B]. controversial view-points in the cause of cancer

  [C]. the relationship between electricity and cancer.

  [D]. different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner.

  2. The view-point of the EPA is

  [A]. there is casual link between electricity and cancer.

  [B]. electricity really affects cancer.

  [C]. controversial.

  [D].low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer

  3. Why did the Pentagon and Whit House object to the release of the report? Because

  [A]. it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration.

  [B]. every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment.

  [C]. the Pentagon’s concern was understandable.

  [D]. they had different arguments.

  4. It can be inferred from physical phenomenon

  [A]. the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful.

  [B]. the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate.

  [C]. electromagnetic field may affect health.

  [D]. only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body.

  5. What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?

  [A].They are indifferent. [B]. They are worried very much.

  [C]. The may exercise prudent avoidance. [C]. They are shocked.

  Vocabulary

  1. preposterous 反常的,十分荒謬的,乖戾的

  2. leukemia 白血病

  3. malignancy 惡性腫瘤

  4. legitimate 合法的,合理的

  5. paranoia 偏執(zhí)狂,妄想狂。這里指:無根據(jù)的擔(dān)心。

  6. lymphoma 淋巴瘤

  7. carcinogen 致癌物

  8. minuscule 很小的,很不重要

  9. consensus 輿論

  10. wallop 亂竄,猛沖,沖擊力

  11. epidemiological 流行病學(xué)的

  12. blistering 羅嗦的,胡扯的

  13. critique 評論,批評

  14. imprimatur 出版許可(官方審查后的),批準(zhǔn)

1 2 3 下一頁
  相關(guān)推薦:英語四六級考試閱讀半邊天: 掌握技術(shù)層面
       2010年大學(xué)英語四六級考試精讀薈萃100篇匯總
文章搜索
中國最優(yōu)秀四六級名師都在這里!
趙建昆老師
在線名師:趙建昆老師
   2003年初進(jìn)入新東方學(xué)校,開始接近7年講臺生涯。目前教授課程有:...[詳細(xì)]
英語四六級考試欄目導(dǎo)航
版權(quán)聲明:如果英語四六級考試網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會及時(shí)處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本英語四六級考試網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請注明出處。